🔗 Share this article

British American Tobacco has been accused of “total contradiction” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

Zambian lobbying efforts

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders requests plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be canceled or deferred.

The company is attempting changes to a proposed legislation that include reductions in the proposed size of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the removal of restrictions on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any companies violating the new laws.

Activist commentary

“As an elected official, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and sustain the fatalities of the Zambian people,” commented the anti-tobacco campaigner.

Thousands of residents a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to global health agency statistics.

The campaigner stated the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within civil society groups.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid wider concerns about industry interference with health policies. Recently, international health experts sounded an alarm that the smoking product companies was increasing attempts to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Corporate signatures are on delayed tax increases in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a diluted statement at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.

Possible outcomes

“Should anti-smoking legislation isn’t passed because of this letter, the consequences may be suffered in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and stipulating that pictorial cautions cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

In the letter, BAT suggests this be lowered to less than half “according to global guideline limits”, postponed for minimum 12 months after the law is enacted.

Global health authorities in fact recommends a caution must occupy at least 50% of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. In the UK, warnings need to encompass sixty-five percent of a product container sides.

Flavor restrictions debate

The company seeks the withdrawal of extensive controls on flavored cigarette varieties, claiming that it would drive users to “illegally traded” products. It suggests banning a limited selection of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for various offences “extending from a fraction of annual sales to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia says the company is dedicated to good corporate behaviour” and “backs the goals of governments to lower tobacco use and the associated health impact” but claims that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

The advocate stated the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The circumstance that many such provisions existed in the UK, where the company maintains its main office, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he stated.

“We live in a connected world. Should I grow cigarettes in my garden and harvest that and sell it out – and my family members avoid tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the generations of my children while my neighbor's family are dying … is in itself total emotional failure.”

Public health laws in the Britain or other nations had not resulted in corporate closures, Chimbala said. “Legislation never shuts down the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “The company operates its business in compliance with current country statutes. Moreover, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which allow for stakeholder participation in regulation development.”

The company was “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, mentioning that young individuals should be safeguarded against access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We advocate for developing rules to achieve intended community wellbeing objectives, while recognizing the range of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, mentioning that BAT’s proposals “mirror the circumstances of the African nation's economy and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of illegal commerce”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.