🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to restrict social platforms access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate internationally. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are watching intently to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing group of states are considering comparable bans.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for under-15s, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". A law may be enacted soon.
• Norway is set to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to protect young people from the "influence of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged the legislature to approve a proposal increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The government in The Netherlands has advised guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic statement demanding a ban for under-16s without a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it highlights of the "addictive" design of these platforms, the step does not create enforceable legislation.

"An effective age barrier is a good starting point," said a leading European lawmaker supporting the resolution.

The UK: A Watchful Approach

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but insisting any action must be "supported by conclusive data".

Earlier, interest gathered behind a legislative effort to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. However, the administration vowed to investigate the topic.

Advocacy groups have expressed apprehensions. One foundation founded by the relatives of a girl who died after being exposed to disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban could fail to improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to create tools that are appropriate and fit for young users," commented a influential peer.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Across America, legislation is largely occurring at the regional government level amid national stalemate.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting under-14s from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule restricting teenagers to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted laws requiring parental consent for minors to create social media accounts.

Despite widespread concern and suggestions from some politicians to follow the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

International Views

Beyond Europe and the US, additional countries are also considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has lifted the required age for one major platform to 16.

However, world organizations strike a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has warned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could prove counterproductive". The agency points out that social networks can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve user protection.

Even as this worldwide discussion continues, the actions of the Australian government and others demonstrate that policymakers internationally are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.